Florida Judges May Not Be “Friends” With Lawyers

Posted by Molly DiBianca On December 13, 2009 In: Social Media in the Workplace

Email This Post | Print this Post

The Florida Judicial Ethics Advisory Committee has issued an opinion on judges’ use of social-networking sites.  In short, the opinion advises judges of the following:

Judges may have a personal page on Facebook or other social-networking sites and may post comments and other materials on their own pages, provided the material does not otherwise violate the Code of Judicial Conduct.

A judge may not be “friends” with any lawyer who may appear before him.

The opinion recognizes that being a Facebook friend does not mean that there is a friendship in the traditional sense.  But, by identifying the lawyer as a “friend,” the judge risks conveying that the lawyer is in a position to influence the judge.  Thus creating or potentially creating, the appearance of impropriety.

[via N.Y.T.]

See also:

What's a "Friend," Really?

Ethical Implications of "Friend-ing" a Witness on Facebook

Searching MySpace and Facebook for Job Applicants and . . . Judges?

 

Follow me on Twitter @MollyDiBi

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)